Logo

Why is pornography still alive and not illegal? Why doesn’t the government do about tricking women into them?

Last Updated: 23.06.2025 01:30

Why is pornography still alive and not illegal? Why doesn’t the government do about tricking women into them?

There is no legitimate reason to make it illegal.

Criminals who won’t hesitate to traffic people, if it makes them money. The way you solve the problem is to remove the financial incentive to traffic people.

When you ban porn, you turn porn production into a criminal enterprise. Criminal enterprises are run by…

Citing trade wars, the World Bank sharply downgrades global economic growth forecast to 2.3% - AP News

Finally, “oh wow I want to protect the wimmens all the poor poor wimmens” ah HA ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha no you heckin’ don’t.

Pornography is still alive and not illegal for two reasons:

Making it illegal harms people, especially women.

Cocaine Sharks: The Disturbing Discovery That’s Shaking Marine Research - Indian Defence Review

And what you personally consider icky has even less bearing on what is or is not illegal. You think porn sex is icky? Fine, you do you, bruh.

If you ask anti-porn crusaders why porn should be banned, you will usually get three answers: “My preacher says the invisible god I worship says it’s wrong,” “sex is icky yucky ick ick ick unless it happens between people I say it should happen between, in situations I say it should happen in,” and “lookit all the women who are hurt by porn, I totally care about saving women (but not respecting their autonomy, offering them paid maternity leave, or, you know, doing any of those other things that would materially improve women’s lives).”

Making it illegal harms people, particularly women.

Et distinctio voluptatem magni repudiandae.

Make a list of the countries that most stringently ban porn, with the harshest penalties.

Make a list of the countries where women are treated as second-class citizens or property.

…criminals.

What is your opinion about homosexuality? Do you think that it is by nature or a choice?

Look, this is simple, so I’ll type slowly: The more open, legitimate, and free porn production is, the fewer women are trafficked. Why on earth would you take the risk of trafficking people to force them to do something plenty of people are willing to do voluntarily?

But don’t mistake your personal opinion for Moral Truth or the law of the land. If it were, I’d have eggplants (aubergine for you Brits) banned tomorrow.

There is no legitimate reason to make it illegal.

Materialists review: This 'captivating' romantic drama explores love and money with 'piercing honesty' - BBC

What your preacher says isn’t worth a wet fart through used toilet paper. Your preacher might say it’s a sin to eat pork or have sex on Sunday or cut your hair in certain ways or whatever, but that doesn’t make it the law of the land.

The number of women willing to do porn voluntarily is staggeringly high. Like you wouldn’t even believe.

Normal people know that what your particular preachers say has no bearing on what is or is not legal.

What are the reasons for your political affiliation with the Democratic party? What are some aspects of the party that you support and some that you do not?

Compare your lists. Notice anything funny?

That’s not a coincidence.

Say by creating an environment where people do the thing voluntarily, et voila.

Startling Health Risk: “Normal” Sodium Levels Linked to Heart Failure - SciTechDaily

Here’s a neat mental exercise: